Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 248-252

Role of MRI in distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma


1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Walaa A. E. Sakr
Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/mmj.mmj_122_19

Rights and Permissions

Objectives To evaluate the role of MRI in the diagnosis of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (mICC), its enhancement pattern with contrast agent, and distinction from poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (pHCC). Background mICC is the second most common primary hepatobiliary tumor that is increasing in incidence. Imaging characteristics in mICC differ significantly, having overlapping imaging features with pHCC. Thus, it is important to differentiate mICC from pHCC. Patients and methods A retrospective MRI study was conducted on 15 patients with mICC and 15 patients with pHCC referred to MRI unit of the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University from June 2017 to January 2019. MRI were analyzed for tumor shape, intratumoral hemorrhage, fibrous capsule, T2 signal intensity, capsular retraction, intratumoral fat, biliary dilatation, vascular invasion, intraductal lesion, intrahepatic metastasis, restricted diffusion, and enhancement pattern after contrast injection. Associations between MRI features and tumor type were examined using the Fisher's exact and χ2 tests. Results Late enhancement was more common in mICC than pHCC (P < 0.001). T2 central hypointense area was more common in mICC versus HCC (P = 0.001). Capsular retraction was more common in mICC than HCC (P = 0.001). Biliary dilatation was more common in mICC than pHCC (P = 0.001). Fat component was more in pHCC than mICC (P = 0.01). Fibrous capsule was more common in pHCC than mICC (P = 0.002). Others parameters were not significant. Conclusion Biliary dilatation, central fibrosis, overlying capsular retraction, and late enhancement at 3 min with absence of fat and fibrous capsule appear to be the most important characteristics for mICC and help its differentiation from pHCC.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed44    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded7    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal